Spitzer Was a Victim of FinCEN

Mar 12, 2008 07:10

It serves Spitzer right to become a victim of the same unconstitutional practices that made his career, but also is informative about what our two-faced bankers are doing.

His transactions were in cash and the banks reported him because he repeatedly withdrew cash--his own. "That kind of activity, repeated over time, is just the kind of thing that would set off alarm bells with a bank's compliance officer, who is trained to be on the lookout for what is called structuring or "smurfing"--a pattern of transactions aimed at hiding the nature or purpose of certain money."

The amounts were actually trivial and means that any one who pays most of their expenses in cash will at one time or another, exceed the arbitrary suspicion level of the teller, who will report you. The same amounts could have been obtained from an ATM machine and triggered an investigation. "The probe began with a referral from banks to an Internal Revenue Service office on Long Island about suspicious transactions."

Miami-based lawyer Gregory Baldwin, summarizes best what happened: "It's such a perfect example of what goes around, comes around." He refused to uphold the oath of office and now he is ridiculed.

The entire federal junta needs to be dissolved, and a good way to help is to pay as much of daily expenses with cash as possible. Hide your transactions! And nothing hides that terrorist operation more than buying the gold and silver coins of the defunct US government. Not only does it constitutes terroristic smurfing activity but nullifies the smurfing liquidity operation of the insolvent Federal Reserve System.

http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8VBF6OO0&show_article=1
http://www.infowars.com/articles/us/dc_madame_big_names_may_be_on_client_list.htm